Review



human derived siglec15 protein  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress human derived siglec15 protein
    Human Derived Siglec15 Protein, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human derived siglec15 protein/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human derived siglec15 protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Sino Biological cd22
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Cd22, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd22/product/Sino Biological
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd22 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec siglec8
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Siglec8, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/siglec8/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    siglec8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec cd328 (siglec-7) antibody, anti-human, reafinity
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Cd328 (Siglec 7) Antibody, Anti Human, Reafinity, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd328 (siglec-7) antibody, anti-human, reafinity/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd328 (siglec-7) antibody, anti-human, reafinity - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec anti human siglec 1 pe vio770
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Anti Human Siglec 1 Pe Vio770, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human siglec 1 pe vio770/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human siglec 1 pe vio770 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    MedChemExpress human derived siglec15 protein
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Human Derived Siglec15 Protein, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human derived siglec15 protein/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human derived siglec15 protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec cd169 pe
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Cd169 Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd169 pe/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd169 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec siglec g pe
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Siglec G Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/siglec g pe/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    siglec g pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher rabbit anti-human siglec-15 polyclonal antibody pa5-72765
    (a) Schematic of <t>CD22</t> target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.
    Rabbit Anti Human Siglec 15 Polyclonal Antibody Pa5 72765, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-human siglec-15 polyclonal antibody pa5-72765/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti-human siglec-15 polyclonal antibody pa5-72765 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec siglec1 apc
    Enhanced TLR7 responses in patients with PC. (A and B) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 16) or HD (controls, n = 20) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist IMQ for 24 h. (A) Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. (B) IFN-α production in response to IMQ is shown relative to the age of female (F) and male (M) patients or controls. Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (C) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist CL087 and the dual TLR7/8 agonist R848 for 24 h. Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. (D) ISRE reporter cells (expressing luciferase under the control of an ISRE, THP1-Dual) were treated with supernatants from the CL087-stimulated PBMCs of chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12). Luciferase activity was quantified with a luminometer, and RLA is represented as fold induction over untreated reporter cells. (E) THP1-Dual cells were treated with the supernatants of CL087-stimulated PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12). The expression of ISG15 and <t>SIGLEC1</t> was analyzed by flow cytometry with intracellular staining. Graphs show MFI as fold induction over basal levels in THP1 cells. (F) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 15) or HD (controls, n = 16) were stimulated with viral nucleic acid surrogates for 24 h. Secreted IFN-α levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay after stimulation with liposome-encapsulated poly(I:C), cGAMP (STING agonist) or poly(dA:dT) (cytosolic DNA sensors), or naked CpG-A (TLR9 agonist). Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (G) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC) or HD (controls) were stimulated for 24 h with SARS-CoV-2 virus ( n = 8) or IAV ( n = 12). Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. Adjusted P values in A and C–G were determined in Mann–Whitney tests with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ns = nonsignificant. IMQ, imiquimod; RLA, relative luciferase activity; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; IAV, influenza A virus.
    Siglec1 Apc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/siglec1 apc/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    siglec1 apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (a) Schematic of CD22 target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Sequence and structural determinants of efficacious de novo chimeric antigen receptors

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.12.694033

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Schematic of CD22 target antigen, with the arrow highlighting the preferred binding pocket as a hydrophobic patch. (b) Summary of YSD screening of de novo designed proteins from two campaigns against CD22. (c) Identification of four hits from the BindCraft campaign via sequencing. (d) CAR co-culture of four de novo CD22 binders (D1-D4) compared to m971 (clinical CAR). Shown is the %CD69 + Jurkats among GFP + cells. (e) Validation of CD22 expression of cell lines in the CAR co-culture. Arrow highlights the absence of CD22 expression in RPMI 8226. (f) Cocultures of three CARs with variable effector to target (E:T) ratios. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression comparing D1 de novo binder to m971 clinical CAR, adjusting for E:T ratio. (g) Diversifying CD22 binder sequences given a single binder (D1). (h) Triplicate CAR Jurkat co-cultures with variable CAR binders. Statistical test: Two-sided Student’s t test. (i) Summary of diversified CD22 sequences in CAR co-culture. “X” highlights off-target activation from parental binder, D1. (j) Activation scores from scRNA-seq profiles of five CAR binders cultured against two different cell lines. Statistical test: two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. (k) Primary CAR T killing curves against RPMI 8226 (CD22 - ) showing off-target-specific killing in the de novo D1 binder. Statistical test: Wald test of linear regression interaction term between D1.N0 binder and time compared to D1, adjusting for time and binder.

    Article Snippet: The following day, cells were washed once with 1× PBS-B (0.25% BSA) and incubated with varying concentrations of biotinylated recombinant antigen BCMA (Sino Biological, Cat. 10620-H40H-B), CD22 (Sino Biological, Cat. 11958-H49H-B), or CD19 (Sino Biological, Cat. 11880-H49H-B) for 1 hour at room temperature.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Sequencing, Co-Culture Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Expressing, Activation Assay, Cell Culture, MANN-WHITNEY

    (a) Summary of mutations introduced to each of the CARPNN diversified CD22 D1 binder. Red residue index denotes interface residues while blue index denotes non-interface residues. (b) Comparison of CAR activation of the evolved CD22 D1 binders in CD22 - RPMI 8226 cell lines and CD22-overexpressing K562 cell lines. (c) Summary of diversified sequences from antigen CAR flow (top) and co-cultures with variable cell lines (bottom). (d) Representative Incucyte killing assays showing the cytolytic activity of CAR T cells expressing either CD22-specific minibinder- or scFv-based receptors. Time-course plots showing normalized red calibrated unit (%RCU) intensity relative to time 0h for each construct. (e) Cytokine productions from CD22-specific CAR T cells in co-cultures with CD22 + and CD22 - target cell lines. Heatmap shows mean cytokine levels across triplicates, revealing elevated cytokine release specifically in response to CD22-expressing targets, consistent with antigen-specific activation and killing. (f) Representative images at 0h and 72h for NB and at 72h for each binder condition to illustrate target-cell killing. Green fluorescence denotes CAR T cells, and red fluorescence denotes the corresponding target cell line. (g) Characterization of CAR antigen binding at variable CD22 concentrations. (h) Identification of plausible candidates of D1 off-target interaction via subsetting HPA surfaceome and GTEx overlap. (i) Comparison of average cofolding ipSAE score between parental D1 to all plausible off-target genes and the evolved D1.N0 binder to plausible off-target genes. (j) Predicted binding site of parental D1 binder towards CXCR4 aligned to a solved structure of CXCR4 (PDB: 8U4R).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Sequence and structural determinants of efficacious de novo chimeric antigen receptors

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.12.694033

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Summary of mutations introduced to each of the CARPNN diversified CD22 D1 binder. Red residue index denotes interface residues while blue index denotes non-interface residues. (b) Comparison of CAR activation of the evolved CD22 D1 binders in CD22 - RPMI 8226 cell lines and CD22-overexpressing K562 cell lines. (c) Summary of diversified sequences from antigen CAR flow (top) and co-cultures with variable cell lines (bottom). (d) Representative Incucyte killing assays showing the cytolytic activity of CAR T cells expressing either CD22-specific minibinder- or scFv-based receptors. Time-course plots showing normalized red calibrated unit (%RCU) intensity relative to time 0h for each construct. (e) Cytokine productions from CD22-specific CAR T cells in co-cultures with CD22 + and CD22 - target cell lines. Heatmap shows mean cytokine levels across triplicates, revealing elevated cytokine release specifically in response to CD22-expressing targets, consistent with antigen-specific activation and killing. (f) Representative images at 0h and 72h for NB and at 72h for each binder condition to illustrate target-cell killing. Green fluorescence denotes CAR T cells, and red fluorescence denotes the corresponding target cell line. (g) Characterization of CAR antigen binding at variable CD22 concentrations. (h) Identification of plausible candidates of D1 off-target interaction via subsetting HPA surfaceome and GTEx overlap. (i) Comparison of average cofolding ipSAE score between parental D1 to all plausible off-target genes and the evolved D1.N0 binder to plausible off-target genes. (j) Predicted binding site of parental D1 binder towards CXCR4 aligned to a solved structure of CXCR4 (PDB: 8U4R).

    Article Snippet: The following day, cells were washed once with 1× PBS-B (0.25% BSA) and incubated with varying concentrations of biotinylated recombinant antigen BCMA (Sino Biological, Cat. 10620-H40H-B), CD22 (Sino Biological, Cat. 11958-H49H-B), or CD19 (Sino Biological, Cat. 11880-H49H-B) for 1 hour at room temperature.

    Techniques: Residue, Comparison, Activation Assay, Activity Assay, Expressing, Construct, Fluorescence, Binding Assay

    Enhanced TLR7 responses in patients with PC. (A and B) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 16) or HD (controls, n = 20) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist IMQ for 24 h. (A) Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. (B) IFN-α production in response to IMQ is shown relative to the age of female (F) and male (M) patients or controls. Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (C) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist CL087 and the dual TLR7/8 agonist R848 for 24 h. Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. (D) ISRE reporter cells (expressing luciferase under the control of an ISRE, THP1-Dual) were treated with supernatants from the CL087-stimulated PBMCs of chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12). Luciferase activity was quantified with a luminometer, and RLA is represented as fold induction over untreated reporter cells. (E) THP1-Dual cells were treated with the supernatants of CL087-stimulated PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12). The expression of ISG15 and SIGLEC1 was analyzed by flow cytometry with intracellular staining. Graphs show MFI as fold induction over basal levels in THP1 cells. (F) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 15) or HD (controls, n = 16) were stimulated with viral nucleic acid surrogates for 24 h. Secreted IFN-α levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay after stimulation with liposome-encapsulated poly(I:C), cGAMP (STING agonist) or poly(dA:dT) (cytosolic DNA sensors), or naked CpG-A (TLR9 agonist). Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (G) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC) or HD (controls) were stimulated for 24 h with SARS-CoV-2 virus ( n = 8) or IAV ( n = 12). Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. Adjusted P values in A and C–G were determined in Mann–Whitney tests with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ns = nonsignificant. IMQ, imiquimod; RLA, relative luciferase activity; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; IAV, influenza A virus.

    Journal: The Journal of Experimental Medicine

    Article Title: Enhanced TLR7-dependent production of type I interferon by pDCs underlies pandemic chilblains

    doi: 10.1084/jem.20231467

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced TLR7 responses in patients with PC. (A and B) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 16) or HD (controls, n = 20) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist IMQ for 24 h. (A) Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. (B) IFN-α production in response to IMQ is shown relative to the age of female (F) and male (M) patients or controls. Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (C) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist CL087 and the dual TLR7/8 agonist R848 for 24 h. Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. (D) ISRE reporter cells (expressing luciferase under the control of an ISRE, THP1-Dual) were treated with supernatants from the CL087-stimulated PBMCs of chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12). Luciferase activity was quantified with a luminometer, and RLA is represented as fold induction over untreated reporter cells. (E) THP1-Dual cells were treated with the supernatants of CL087-stimulated PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12). The expression of ISG15 and SIGLEC1 was analyzed by flow cytometry with intracellular staining. Graphs show MFI as fold induction over basal levels in THP1 cells. (F) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 15) or HD (controls, n = 16) were stimulated with viral nucleic acid surrogates for 24 h. Secreted IFN-α levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay after stimulation with liposome-encapsulated poly(I:C), cGAMP (STING agonist) or poly(dA:dT) (cytosolic DNA sensors), or naked CpG-A (TLR9 agonist). Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (G) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC) or HD (controls) were stimulated for 24 h with SARS-CoV-2 virus ( n = 8) or IAV ( n = 12). Secreted IFN-α was evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. Adjusted P values in A and C–G were determined in Mann–Whitney tests with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ns = nonsignificant. IMQ, imiquimod; RLA, relative luciferase activity; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; IAV, influenza A virus.

    Article Snippet: Permeabilized cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following antibodies: ISG15 PE (clone 851701, Cat. IC8044P, RRID:AB_3656663, 1:200 dilution; R&D Systems) and SIGLEC1 APC (clone 7-239, Cat. 130-098-645, RRID:AB_2655547, 1:400 dilution; Miltenyi Biotec), in the presence of Human TruStain FcX (AB_2818986; BioLegend).

    Techniques: Isolation, Expressing, Luciferase, Control, Activity Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Virus, MANN-WHITNEY, Fluorescence

    Related to . (A) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 13) or HD (controls, n = 16) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist IMQ for 24 h. Secreted cytokines were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (B) THP1-Dual reporter cells were treated with various doses of recombinant IFN-α (rIFN-α2b), ranging from 10 to 1,000 IU/ml. Left panel: luciferase activity was quantified with a luminometer, and RLA is represented as fold induction over untreated reporter cells. Right panels: the expression of ISG15 and SIGLEC1 was analyzed by flow cytometry with intracellular staining. Graphs show MFI as fold induction over basal levels in THP1 cells. The dashed lines represent the mean type I IFN activity levels for supernatants from the TLR7-stimulated leukocytes of HD (black) (controls, n = 12) and chilblain patients (red) (PC, n = 12). (C) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 15) or HD (controls, n = 16) were stimulated with viral nucleic acid surrogates for 24 h. Secreted IFN-β levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay after stimulation with liposome-encapsulated poly(I:C), cGAMP (STING agonist) or poly(dA:dT) (cytosolic DNA sensors), or naked CpG-A (TLR9 agonist). Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (D) PBMCs from PC patients or controls were stimulated for 24 h with SARS-CoV-2 ( n = 8) or IAV ( n = 12). Secreted IFN-β levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. (E) PBMCs from PC patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12) were stimulated for 24 h with HSV-1. Secreted IFN-α and IFN-β levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. (F) Distribution of lymphoid and myeloid subsets among PBMCs from PC patients (PC, n = 12) and HD (controls, n = 14) was determined by flow cytometry. Data are represented as percentages of total CD45 + cells. CM, central memory T cells; EM, effector memory T cells; EMRA, CD45RA + effector memory T cells; NK, natural killer cells; cDC CD1c + , CD1c + conventional dendritic cells; cDC CD1c − , CD1c − conventional dendritic cells. (G) Frequency of CD123 + BDCA2 + pDCs in PBMCs from PC patients ( n = 12) and controls ( n = 14), as analyzed in F, is shown on a separate graph. Bars represent the mean ± SD. The adjusted P values in A, C–E, and G were determined in Mann–Whitney tests with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. *P < 0.05; ns = nonsignificant. IMQ, imiquimod; RLA, relative luciferase activity; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; IAV, influenza A virus.

    Journal: The Journal of Experimental Medicine

    Article Title: Enhanced TLR7-dependent production of type I interferon by pDCs underlies pandemic chilblains

    doi: 10.1084/jem.20231467

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Related to . (A) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 13) or HD (controls, n = 16) were stimulated with the TLR7-selective agonist IMQ for 24 h. Secreted cytokines were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (B) THP1-Dual reporter cells were treated with various doses of recombinant IFN-α (rIFN-α2b), ranging from 10 to 1,000 IU/ml. Left panel: luciferase activity was quantified with a luminometer, and RLA is represented as fold induction over untreated reporter cells. Right panels: the expression of ISG15 and SIGLEC1 was analyzed by flow cytometry with intracellular staining. Graphs show MFI as fold induction over basal levels in THP1 cells. The dashed lines represent the mean type I IFN activity levels for supernatants from the TLR7-stimulated leukocytes of HD (black) (controls, n = 12) and chilblain patients (red) (PC, n = 12). (C) PBMCs from chilblain patients (PC, n = 15) or HD (controls, n = 16) were stimulated with viral nucleic acid surrogates for 24 h. Secreted IFN-β levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay after stimulation with liposome-encapsulated poly(I:C), cGAMP (STING agonist) or poly(dA:dT) (cytosolic DNA sensors), or naked CpG-A (TLR9 agonist). Freshly isolated PBMCs were used in these experiments. (D) PBMCs from PC patients or controls were stimulated for 24 h with SARS-CoV-2 ( n = 8) or IAV ( n = 12). Secreted IFN-β levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. Cryopreserved PBMCs were used in these experiments. (E) PBMCs from PC patients (PC, n = 12) or HD (controls, n = 12) were stimulated for 24 h with HSV-1. Secreted IFN-α and IFN-β levels were evaluated in a LEGENDplex assay. (F) Distribution of lymphoid and myeloid subsets among PBMCs from PC patients (PC, n = 12) and HD (controls, n = 14) was determined by flow cytometry. Data are represented as percentages of total CD45 + cells. CM, central memory T cells; EM, effector memory T cells; EMRA, CD45RA + effector memory T cells; NK, natural killer cells; cDC CD1c + , CD1c + conventional dendritic cells; cDC CD1c − , CD1c − conventional dendritic cells. (G) Frequency of CD123 + BDCA2 + pDCs in PBMCs from PC patients ( n = 12) and controls ( n = 14), as analyzed in F, is shown on a separate graph. Bars represent the mean ± SD. The adjusted P values in A, C–E, and G were determined in Mann–Whitney tests with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. *P < 0.05; ns = nonsignificant. IMQ, imiquimod; RLA, relative luciferase activity; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; IAV, influenza A virus.

    Article Snippet: Permeabilized cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following antibodies: ISG15 PE (clone 851701, Cat. IC8044P, RRID:AB_3656663, 1:200 dilution; R&D Systems) and SIGLEC1 APC (clone 7-239, Cat. 130-098-645, RRID:AB_2655547, 1:400 dilution; Miltenyi Biotec), in the presence of Human TruStain FcX (AB_2818986; BioLegend).

    Techniques: Isolation, Recombinant, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, MANN-WHITNEY, Fluorescence, Virus